Talk:Constitution

Errors and Omissions in the Constitutions

There are some obvious errors and omissions in the constitution. For example, there is no "obligations" section for associate members.

1. Should we make a revised version with these errors fixed. That way, if the exec ever wants to ammend the constitution with some other changes, they can include these "fixes" as well?
2. Should we verify that the constitution we have in .DOC and wiki format actually matches the one the AMS has on file? The .DOC file was the proposed constitution presented at the AGM before filing. It's possible that some minor fixes were incorporated before filing.

--Chris Michalak 10:34, 16 Sep 2006 (MST)

Now that this page is protected, and can't even be edited by a member of the executive, it would be good if someone checked to make sure it is accurate. Scott Webster 00:19, 24 November 2006 (MST)

Dan E. told me that it's exact, aka. copied from the website... Champagne 00:25, 24 November 2006 (MST)

The only file I can find on the website is "VOCconstitution02.doc" labelled as "The 2001 revised VOC constitution (needs approval at AGM)" Doesn't inspire too much confidence in it being correct. I believe this file (in the Misc Docs section) is what Chris was talking about above. Scott Webster 00:39, 24 November 2006 (MST)

--Sonialandwehr (talk) 10:28, 27 February 2024 (PST)

How does one get access to edit this page? This constitution is in need of updating now.--Sonialandwehr (talk) 10:28, 27 February 2024 (PST)